Component
Chamomile extract in the 2016 anxiety-relapse trial
Chamomile extract in the 2016 anxiety-relapse trial
2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What it acts on
Chamomile continuation did not significantly reduce the primary relapse outcome: 7/46 versus 12/47, hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.20–1.33, P=0.16.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "Continued chamomile extract", "comparator": "Placebo after initial response", "endpoint": "Chamomile continuation did not significantly reduce the primary relapse outcome: 7/46 versus 12/47, hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.20–1.33, P=0.16.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; recorded from source.
- experimental_model
- 93 responders randomized after a 12-week open-label phase; 1500 mg extract/day, 26-week continuation.
- interpretation_status
- Recorded from source with stated access limits; ungraded, not independent replication.
- limitations
- Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation.
- nutrient_topic
- Apigenin collection; exact intervention and molecular form govern interpretation. · Apigenin
- plain_language
- Chamomile continuation did not significantly reduce the primary relapse outcome: 7/46 versus 12/47, hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.20–1.33, P=0.16.
- primary_references
- Long-term chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial. | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912875/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5646235/ | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2016.10.012
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference api-chamomile-relapse-null; Responder-enriched design and imprecision limit inference. Secondary symptom scores improved, but they do not replace the null primary outcome.
Apigenin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 10 October 2026) · lines 820–826
AI-assisted original curation of primary studies; claim-local access and experimental limitations stated. Includes original-draft correction history. No independent replication claimed. · supports · 93 responders randomized after a 12-week open-label phase; 1500 mg extract/day, 26-week continuation. · Recorded from source · Recorded from source
### api-chamomile-relapse-null Chamomile continuation did not significantly reduce the primary relapse outcome: 7/46 versus 12/47, hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.20–1.33, P=0.16. Responder-enriched design and imprecision limit inference. Secondary symptom scores improved, but they do not replace the null primary outcome. Model and exposure: 93 responders randomized after a 12-week open-label phase; 1500 mg extract/day, 26-week continuation. Limitations: Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation. Reference: Long-term chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial. | 2016 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912875/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5646235/ | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2016.10.012 | Access: Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe continuation trial reported better secondary anxiety-symptom scores with chamomile, P=0.0032.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "Continued extract", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The continuation trial reported better secondary anxiety-symptom scores with chamomile, P=0.0032.", "effect_direction": "decrease", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; recorded from source.
- experimental_model
- Same responder-enriched study.
- interpretation_status
- Recorded from source with stated access limits; ungraded, not independent replication.
- limitations
- Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation.
- nutrient_topic
- Apigenin collection; exact intervention and molecular form govern interpretation. · Apigenin
- plain_language
- The continuation trial reported better secondary anxiety-symptom scores with chamomile, P=0.0032.
- primary_references
- Long-term chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial. | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912875/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5646235/ | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2016.10.012
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference api-chamomile-symptoms; Kept alongside the nonsignificant primary relapse result, not substituted for it.
Apigenin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 10 October 2026) · lines 828–834
AI-assisted original curation of primary studies; claim-local access and experimental limitations stated. Includes original-draft correction history. No independent replication claimed. · supports · Same responder-enriched study. · Recorded from source · Recorded from source
### api-chamomile-symptoms The continuation trial reported better secondary anxiety-symptom scores with chamomile, P=0.0032. Kept alongside the nonsignificant primary relapse result, not substituted for it. Model and exposure: Same responder-enriched study. Limitations: Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation. Reference: Long-term chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial. | 2016 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912875/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5646235/ | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2016.10.012 | Access: Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.