Component

Clinician-rated autism trial outcomes

Clinician-rated autism trial outcomes. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Clinician-rated scales improved, whereas caregiver-rated scales did not significantly differ from placebo.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/sulforaphane-research/36427174.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "82957fc566b0bccc87dd6f53d6ad61edfa3d5b0b99ba6f557628c68f53faf1cc", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 826, "text_sha256": "82957fc566b0bccc87dd6f53d6ad61edfa3d5b0b99ba6f557628c68f53faf1cc"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized double-blind multicenter trial
    exposure
    Twelve-week treatment comparison
    limitations
    Rater-dependent results need replication; do not select only the favorable scale.
    nutrient_topic
    Sulforaphane research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Sulforaphane / SFN, stereochemistry specified per study
    organism
    Human, 108 participants with ASD in China
    plain_language
    The trial did not give one consistent result across observers.
    primary_references
    [sulforaphane-p36427174] Efficacy of Sulforaphane in Treatment of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Multi-center Trial. (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36427174/ DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05784-9
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Caregiver versus clinician outcome ratings

    Sulforaphane: formation, electrophile sensing and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 1399–1410

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized double-blind multicenter trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### sulforaphane-autism-rater-difference Clinician-rated scales improved, whereas caregiver-rated scales did not significantly differ from placebo. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Sulforaphane research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The trial did not give one consistent result across observers. organism: Human, 108 participants with ASD in China tissue_or_cell_type: Caregiver versus clinician outcome ratings experimental_model: Randomized double-blind multicenter trial limitations: Rater-dependent results need replication; do not select only the favorable scale. exposure: Twelve-week treatment comparison evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/sulforaphane-research/36427174.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "82957fc566b0bccc87dd6f53d6ad61edfa3d5b0b99ba6f557628c68f53faf1cc", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 826, "text_sha256": "82957fc566b0bccc87dd6f53d6ad61edfa3d5b0b99ba6f557628c68f53faf1cc"} [sulforaphane-p36427174] Efficacy of Sulforaphane in Treatment of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Multi-center Trial. (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36427174/ DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05784-9
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards