Component
Temozolomide
Temozolomide. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
Where it participates (unsigned role)
In 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma given mebendazole with adjuvant temozolomide, four patients at 200 milligrams per kilogram per day developed elevated grade 3 alanine aminotransferase or aspartate transaminase after one month which reversed with lower dosing or discontinuation, plasma levels were variable but generally increased with dose, and mebendazole at doses up to 200 milligrams per kilogram demonstrated long-term safety and acceptable toxicity.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/33506200.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1712, "text_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6"}
- experimental_model
- Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma
- exposure
- Oral mebendazole at 25, 50, 100 and 200 milligrams per kilogram per day with adjuvant temozolomide, with trough plasma levels at 4, 8 and 16 weeks
- limitations
- The only human oncology record here. It is a single-arm dose-escalation and safety study without a control group, so the survival figures cannot be read as efficacy.
- nutrient_topic
- Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. · Mebendazole
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- At the highest dose one patient in six developed liver enzyme rises that reversed on stopping.
- primary_references
- [mbz-p33506200] Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33506200/ DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa154
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Brain
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### mbz-human-dose-escalation In 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma given mebendazole with adjuvant temozolomide, four patients at 200 milligrams per kilogram per day developed elevated grade 3 alanine aminotransferase or aspartate transaminase after one month which reversed with lower dosing or discontinuation, plasma levels were variable but generally increased with dose, and mebendazole at doses up to 200 milligrams per kilogram demonstrated long-term safety and acceptable toxicity. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. plain_language: At the highest dose one patient in six developed liver enzyme rises that reversed on stopping. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Brain experimental_model: Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma limitations: The only human oncology record here. It is a single-arm dose-escalation and safety study without a control group, so the survival figures cannot be read as efficacy. exposure: Oral mebendazole at 25, 50, 100 and 200 milligrams per kilogram per day with adjuvant temozolomide, with trough plasma levels at 4, 8 and 16 weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/33506200.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1712, "text_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6"} [mbz-p33506200] Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33506200/ DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa154
Complete structured claim and evidenceKaplan-Meier analysis showed a 21-month median overall survival with 41.7% of patients alive at 2 years and 25% at 3 and 4 years, and median progression-free survival from diagnosis was 13.1 months for 17 patients taking more than one month of mebendazole against 9.2 months for 7 patients who received less than one month, with the authors concluding that further studies are needed to determine efficacy in malignant glioma.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/33506200.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1712, "text_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6"}
- experimental_model
- Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma
- exposure
- Oral mebendazole at 25, 50, 100 and 200 milligrams per kilogram per day with adjuvant temozolomide, with trough plasma levels at 4, 8 and 16 weeks
- limitations
- The only human oncology record here. It is a single-arm dose-escalation and safety study without a control group, so the survival figures cannot be read as efficacy.
- nutrient_topic
- Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. · Mebendazole
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- Patients who stayed on it longer did better, but there was no control group and staying on a drug longer is itself a sign of doing well.
- primary_references
- [mbz-p33506200] Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33506200/ DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa154
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Brain
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### mbz-uncontrolled-survival-figures Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 21-month median overall survival with 41.7% of patients alive at 2 years and 25% at 3 and 4 years, and median progression-free survival from diagnosis was 13.1 months for 17 patients taking more than one month of mebendazole against 9.2 months for 7 patients who received less than one month, with the authors concluding that further studies are needed to determine efficacy in malignant glioma. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. plain_language: Patients who stayed on it longer did better, but there was no control group and staying on a drug longer is itself a sign of doing well. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Brain experimental_model: Single-centre dose-escalation and safety study in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma limitations: The only human oncology record here. It is a single-arm dose-escalation and safety study without a control group, so the survival figures cannot be read as efficacy. exposure: Oral mebendazole at 25, 50, 100 and 200 milligrams per kilogram per day with adjuvant temozolomide, with trough plasma levels at 4, 8 and 16 weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/33506200.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1712, "text_sha256": "ab5f2c1d14ccb7fa9f690201326bdbfcab3e07758bc78b76ff9adec2ca774ec6"} [mbz-p33506200] Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33506200/ DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa154
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.