Component

Pembrolizumab

Pembrolizumab. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

Where it participates (unsigned role)

  1. In two single-patient studies, one in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer who received BTH1677 combined with the tumour targeting antibody cetuximab and a second in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour who received BTH1677 combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the patients had low serum titres of antibodies against beta-glucan and low innate immune effector functionality induced by BTH1677, and addition of intravenous immunoglobulins restored innate immune activity of BTH1677 and induced clinically meaningful anti-tumoural activity with long-term disease control.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/32132045.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "7dea757c889af10839a38a317d704760e7e15798bc15a5da3a1323ec4143cf42", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1102, "text_sha256": "7dea757c889af10839a38a317d704760e7e15798bc15a5da3a1323ec4143cf42"}
    experimental_model
    Two single-patient reports of immunoglobulin infusion in patients with low anti-glucan antibody
    exposure
    BTH1677 with cetuximab or with pembrolizumab, plus intravenous immunoglobulin
    limitations
    Two patients. This is an anecdotal test of a mechanism, not evidence of treatment benefit, and no control condition exists for the tumour outcome.
    nutrient_topic
    Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. · Beta-glucan
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    Two patients who lacked the antibody were given antibody, and the drug started working.
    primary_references
    [bg-p32132045] Immunoglobulin Restores Immune Responses to BTH1677 in Patients With Low Levels of Antibodies to Beta-glucan. (2020). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32132045/ DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14090
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Peripheral blood and tumour
    trigger_kind
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Beta-glucan: a structural family rather than an agent, what decides whether a bound glucan actually signals, the complement route that a cereal and a yeast preparation share, and the unequal human evidence behind each (2026-09-22) · lines 294–305

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Two single-patient reports of immunoglobulin infusion in patients with low anti-glucan antibody · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### bg-adding-antibody-restores-it In two single-patient studies, one in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer who received BTH1677 combined with the tumour targeting antibody cetuximab and a second in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour who received BTH1677 combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the patients had low serum titres of antibodies against beta-glucan and low innate immune effector functionality induced by BTH1677, and addition of intravenous immunoglobulins restored innate immune activity of BTH1677 and induced clinically meaningful anti-tumoural activity with long-term disease control. Condition category: biomarker_context nutrient_topic: Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. plain_language: Two patients who lacked the antibody were given antibody, and the drug started working. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Peripheral blood and tumour experimental_model: Two single-patient reports of immunoglobulin infusion in patients with low anti-glucan antibody limitations: Two patients. This is an anecdotal test of a mechanism, not evidence of treatment benefit, and no control condition exists for the tumour outcome. exposure: BTH1677 with cetuximab or with pembrolizumab, plus intravenous immunoglobulin evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/32132045.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "7dea757c889af10839a38a317d704760e7e15798bc15a5da3a1323ec4143cf42", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1102, "text_sha256": "7dea757c889af10839a38a317d704760e7e15798bc15a5da3a1323ec4143cf42"} [bg-p32132045] Immunoglobulin Restores Immune Responses to BTH1677 in Patients With Low Levels of Antibodies to Beta-glucan. (2020). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32132045/ DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14090
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  2. Confirmed objective response rate was 10% with one complete and two partial responses, median progression-free survival was 2.6 months and median overall survival was 11.1 months, prior immunotherapy negatively influenced overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.95, and the combination of Imprime and pembrolizumab is tolerable but did not improve the outcome of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who previously progressed on anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/39670007.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2aad97fa3dcbfbdcedfc88a4fbcad902de0cbade16dcf3c94b26a9c6960ced38", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2076, "text_sha256": "2aad97fa3dcbfbdcedfc88a4fbcad902de0cbade16dcf3c94b26a9c6960ced38"}
    experimental_model
    Investigator-initiated multi-institutional single-arm phase Ib/II trial in previously treated patients
    exposure
    Imprime PGG at the 4 milligram per kilogram maximum tolerated dose with pembrolizumab
    limitations
    Single-arm with no randomised comparator, in patients who had already progressed on checkpoint blockade. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy.
    nutrient_topic
    Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. · Beta-glucan
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    Added to a checkpoint drug in patients who had already failed one, it did not help.
    primary_references
    [bg-p39670007] Phase Ib/II study of imprime PGG and pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): BTCRC LUN 15-017. (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39670007/ DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-346
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    Beta-glucan: a structural family rather than an agent, what decides whether a bound glucan actually signals, the complement route that a cereal and a yeast preparation share, and the unequal human evidence behind each (2026-09-22) · lines 333–344

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Investigator-initiated multi-institutional single-arm phase Ib/II trial in previously treated patients · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### bg-no-benefit-with-pembrolizumab Confirmed objective response rate was 10% with one complete and two partial responses, median progression-free survival was 2.6 months and median overall survival was 11.1 months, prior immunotherapy negatively influenced overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.95, and the combination of Imprime and pembrolizumab is tolerable but did not improve the outcome of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who previously progressed on anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. plain_language: Added to a checkpoint drug in patients who had already failed one, it did not help. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer experimental_model: Investigator-initiated multi-institutional single-arm phase Ib/II trial in previously treated patients limitations: Single-arm with no randomised comparator, in patients who had already progressed on checkpoint blockade. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy. exposure: Imprime PGG at the 4 milligram per kilogram maximum tolerated dose with pembrolizumab evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/39670007.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2aad97fa3dcbfbdcedfc88a4fbcad902de0cbade16dcf3c94b26a9c6960ced38", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2076, "text_sha256": "2aad97fa3dcbfbdcedfc88a4fbcad902de0cbade16dcf3c94b26a9c6960ced38"} [bg-p39670007] Phase Ib/II study of imprime PGG and pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): BTCRC LUN 15-017. (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39670007/ DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-346
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards