Component

The NCI COMPARE activity-profile comparison

The NCI COMPARE activity-profile comparison. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

Where it participates (unsigned role)

  1. The effective concentrations of mebendazole to inhibit GL261 glioblastoma cell viability, microtubule polymerization and metaphase arrest were very similar, and using mebendazole as a seed for the NCI COMPARE program revealed that the top-scoring drugs were highly enriched in microtubule-targeting drugs, indicating that the cell toxicity of mebendazole is indeed caused by inhibiting microtubule formation.

    Mebendazole → Mitotic arrest source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/28386621.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "20ef610d6b4a341f8a0a3f731bbea5477badbee517062c303bbf1075f3a29865", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1788, "text_sha256": "20ef610d6b4a341f8a0a3f731bbea5477badbee517062c303bbf1075f3a29865"}
    experimental_model
    Concentration-matched comparison of viability, microtubule polymerisation and metaphase arrest, with NCI COMPARE analysis and a head-to-head animal comparison against vincristine
    exposure
    Mebendazole against vincristine close to its maximum tolerated dose in orthotopic GL261 tumours
    limitations
    Tests whether the anticancer effect is the microtubule effect by matching concentrations across three assays, which most repurposing studies do not do.
    nutrient_topic
    Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. · Mebendazole
    organism
    Mouse
    plain_language
    The concentration that kills the cell is the concentration that blocks its microtubules, so it is the same mechanism.
    primary_references
    [mbz-p28386621] Repurposing Mebendazole as a Replacement for Vincristine for the Treatment of Brain Tumors. (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28386621/ DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2017.00011
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Glioblastoma

    Mebendazole: the tubulin it binds, why that is selective, the crystal form that decides whether any of it works, and the off-target that became an oncology programme (2026-09-22) · lines 498–509

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Concentration-matched comparison of viability, microtubule polymerisation and metaphase arrest, with NCI COMPARE analysis and a head-to-head animal comparison against vincristine · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### mbz-the-anticancer-effect-is-tubulin The effective concentrations of mebendazole to inhibit GL261 glioblastoma cell viability, microtubule polymerization and metaphase arrest were very similar, and using mebendazole as a seed for the NCI COMPARE program revealed that the top-scoring drugs were highly enriched in microtubule-targeting drugs, indicating that the cell toxicity of mebendazole is indeed caused by inhibiting microtubule formation. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. plain_language: The concentration that kills the cell is the concentration that blocks its microtubules, so it is the same mechanism. organism: Mouse tissue_or_cell_type: Glioblastoma experimental_model: Concentration-matched comparison of viability, microtubule polymerisation and metaphase arrest, with NCI COMPARE analysis and a head-to-head animal comparison against vincristine limitations: Tests whether the anticancer effect is the microtubule effect by matching concentrations across three assays, which most repurposing studies do not do. exposure: Mebendazole against vincristine close to its maximum tolerated dose in orthotopic GL261 tumours evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/28386621.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "20ef610d6b4a341f8a0a3f731bbea5477badbee517062c303bbf1075f3a29865", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1788, "text_sha256": "20ef610d6b4a341f8a0a3f731bbea5477badbee517062c303bbf1075f3a29865"} [mbz-p28386621] Repurposing Mebendazole as a Replacement for Vincristine for the Treatment of Brain Tumors. (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28386621/ DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2017.00011
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards