Component
Albumin-bound paclitaxel formulation
Drug formulation used as a cointervention; not identical to free paclitaxel or albumin alone.
2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
Where it participates (unsigned role)
Median progression-free survival was 6.2 versus 3.9 months (HR 0.43; 90% CI 0.20–0.92; P=0.029).
Experimental context and source evidence
- experimental_model
- Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis.
- exposure
- Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with or without IV pharmacologic ascorbate 75 g three times weekly.
- limitations
- Small unblinded trial; a planned futility interim analysis was followed by efficacy-based closure supported by the monitoring committee, without a stated prespecified efficacy boundary. 34 treated/evaluable of 36 randomized, 90% rather than 95% intervals, one-sided design. Tumor redox mediators were not measured; requires confirmation and does not support replacing chemotherapy.
- nutrient_topic
- Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin C
- organism
- Homo sapiens
- plain_language
- The treated group also had a longer measured interval before progression or death.
- primary_references
- [c-bodeker2024] A randomized trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369582/ DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103375
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Human blood or whole-person endpoints
Vitamin C: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1818–1828
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### c-iv-pancreas-progression-signal Median progression-free survival was 6.2 versus 3.9 months (HR 0.43; 90% CI 0.20–0.92; P=0.029). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The treated group also had a longer measured interval before progression or death. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Human blood or whole-person endpoints experimental_model: Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis. limitations: Small unblinded trial; a planned futility interim analysis was followed by efficacy-based closure supported by the monitoring committee, without a stated prespecified efficacy boundary. 34 treated/evaluable of 36 randomized, 90% rather than 95% intervals, one-sided design. Tumor redox mediators were not measured; requires confirmation and does not support replacing chemotherapy. exposure: Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with or without IV pharmacologic ascorbate 75 g three times weekly. [c-bodeker2024] A randomized trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369582/ DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103375
Complete structured claim and evidenceMedian overall survival was 16 versus 8.3 months with versus without added IV ascorbate (HR 0.46; 90% CI 0.23–0.92; P=0.030).
Experimental context and source evidence
- experimental_model
- Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis.
- exposure
- Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with or without IV pharmacologic ascorbate 75 g three times weekly.
- limitations
- Small unblinded trial; a planned futility interim analysis was followed by efficacy-based closure supported by the monitoring committee, without a stated prespecified efficacy boundary. 34 treated/evaluable of 36 randomized, 90% rather than 95% intervals, one-sided design. Tumor redox mediators were not measured; requires confirmation and does not support replacing chemotherapy.
- nutrient_topic
- Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin C
- organism
- Homo sapiens
- plain_language
- Adding the infusions to the two-drug regimen produced a promising survival signal in this small study.
- primary_references
- [c-bodeker2024] A randomized trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369582/ DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103375
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Human blood or whole-person endpoints
Vitamin C: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1806–1816
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### c-iv-pancreas-survival-signal Median overall survival was 16 versus 8.3 months with versus without added IV ascorbate (HR 0.46; 90% CI 0.23–0.92; P=0.030). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Adding the infusions to the two-drug regimen produced a promising survival signal in this small study. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Human blood or whole-person endpoints experimental_model: Unblinded randomized phase II metastatic pancreatic cancer trial at two academic sites: 36 randomized, 34 received assigned therapy and entered analysis. limitations: Small unblinded trial; a planned futility interim analysis was followed by efficacy-based closure supported by the monitoring committee, without a stated prespecified efficacy boundary. 34 treated/evaluable of 36 randomized, 90% rather than 95% intervals, one-sided design. Tumor redox mediators were not measured; requires confirmation and does not support replacing chemotherapy. exposure: Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with or without IV pharmacologic ascorbate 75 g three times weekly. [c-bodeker2024] A randomized trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369582/ DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103375
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.