Component

Intestinal mucosal copper retention

Intestinal mucosal copper retention; model and exposure are recorded in linked claims.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

Where it participates (unsigned role)

  1. Rat diets with zinc up to 450 mg/kg did not change 64Cu absorption; 900 mg/kg reduced it by about 40% and increased mucosal 64Cu uptake.

    Zinc → Intestinal copper absorption source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    cross_nutrient
    Copper (affected_nutrient); Intestinal mucosal copper retention (increased_endpoint)
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/zinc-signaling-sources/479878-abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract", "file_sha256": "643b0358984f3caac8a20e3202c14a073d11ff88758c7a9637b6f8523195658b"}
    experimental_model
    Dietary radiotracer experiments in rats
    exposure
    High dietary zinc or copper and reciprocal 64Cu/65Zn absorption measurements.
    limitations
    High animal dietary concentrations are not human intake thresholds. Copper displacement from metallothionein was the authors’ mechanistic interpretation.
    nutrient_topic
    Zinc research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Zinc
    organism
    Rattus norvegicus
    plain_language
    Very high zinc trapped more copper in the intestine while less was absorbed.
    primary_references
    [zn-sig-479878] Intestinal metallothionein and the mutual antagonism between copper and zinc in the rat. (1979). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/479878/ DOI: 10.1016/s0162-0134(00)80054-9
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Small intestine

    Zinc: transport, enzyme loading, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 901–913

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Dietary radiotracer experiments in rats · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### zn-sig-zinc-copper-absorption Rat diets with zinc up to 450 mg/kg did not change 64Cu absorption; 900 mg/kg reduced it by about 40% and increased mucosal 64Cu uptake. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Zinc research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Very high zinc trapped more copper in the intestine while less was absorbed. organism: Rattus norvegicus tissue_or_cell_type: Small intestine experimental_model: Dietary radiotracer experiments in rats limitations: High animal dietary concentrations are not human intake thresholds. Copper displacement from metallothionein was the authors’ mechanistic interpretation. exposure: High dietary zinc or copper and reciprocal 64Cu/65Zn absorption measurements. cross_nutrient: Copper (affected_nutrient); Intestinal mucosal copper retention (increased_endpoint) evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/zinc-signaling-sources/479878-abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract", "file_sha256": "643b0358984f3caac8a20e3202c14a073d11ff88758c7a9637b6f8523195658b"} [zn-sig-479878] Intestinal metallothionein and the mutual antagonism between copper and zinc in the rat. (1979). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/479878/ DOI: 10.1016/s0162-0134(00)80054-9
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards