{"id":"da2fce79-11d8-5fb9-ac61-6055010e97e5","stable_key":"33bef151-bdc7-5892-aff6-0345ab149739:elastase-restores-no-flow-in-the-same-model","predicate":"does_not_restore","statement":"Elastase restored 0% of blood flow in the same model.","claim_class":"mechanistic","status":"source_derived_draft","evidence_grade":"ungraded","direction":"neutral","is_public":true,"mechanism_event_id":"f676fd40-5fb6-5c35-9c1a-e1897db863a8","mechanism_event_label":"Elastase restored 0% of blood flow in the same model.","subject":{"id":"8d13d600-a554-51d1-ab84-5327350d139d","slug":"elastase","display_name":"Elastase, as used in the 1995 rat thrombolysis comparison","entity_type_key":"protein"},"object":{"id":"5f4af78b-228e-5f84-9c69-f2baeaf36458","slug":"rat-carotid-blood-flow-recovery","display_name":"Arterial blood flow recovery in the rat carotid thrombosis model","entity_type_key":"cellular_process"},"evidence_count":1,"mechanism_event":{"id":"f676fd40-5fb6-5c35-9c1a-e1897db863a8","stable_key":"33bef151-bdc7-5892-aff6-0345ab149739:elastase-restores-no-flow-in-the-same-model-event","event_type":"observed_intervention","label":"Elastase restored 0% of blood flow in the same model.","description":"Common carotid artery, acetic-acid endothelial injury","status":"provisional","compartment":null,"participants":[{"entity":{"id":"8d13d600-a554-51d1-ab84-5327350d139d","slug":"elastase","display_name":"Elastase, as used in the 1995 rat thrombolysis comparison","entity_type_key":"protein"},"role":"acting component","stoichiometry":null,"state_label":"","sequence_order":0,"notes":""},{"entity":{"id":"5f4af78b-228e-5f84-9c69-f2baeaf36458","slug":"rat-carotid-blood-flow-recovery","display_name":"Arterial blood flow recovery in the rat carotid thrombosis model","entity_type_key":"cellular_process"},"role":"component the finding is about","stoichiometry":null,"state_label":"","sequence_order":1,"notes":""}]},"contexts":[{"dimension":"duration","value_text":"60 min monitoring","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"evidence_access","value_text":"Primary PubMed abstract and indexed metadata reviewed. Full-text method details not stated here remain unresolved.","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"experimental_model","value_text":"Rat","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"exposure","value_text":"Elastase, equimolar with nattokinase","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"limitations","value_text":"A measured zero, which is what makes the comparison informative: a fibrino(geno)lytic enzyme is not automatically thrombolytic in this model.","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"organism","value_text":"Rat","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"plain_language","value_text":"Elastase restored 0% of blood flow in the same model.","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"primary_references","value_text":"Thrombolytic effect of nattokinase on a chemically induced thrombosis model in rat. (1995) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8593442/ DOI: 10.1248/bpb.18.1387","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"route","value_text":"In vivo, intravenous","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null},{"dimension":"tissue","value_text":"Common carotid artery, acetic-acid endothelial injury","comparator":null,"unit":null,"notes":"","entity":null}],"evidence":[{"id":"a9a7af68-bbde-5d1d-a5f9-efad702a002c","evidence_kind":"source_excerpt","locator":"Lines 290-290","start_line":290,"end_line":290,"excerpt":"Elastase restored 0% of blood flow in the same model.","model_system":"Rat","directness":"reported_statement","verification_status":"source_derived_draft","notes":"","relationship":"supports","weight":1.0,"link_notes":"","source":{"id":"41cb127c-1c23-53aa-b7d0-5ec7f6fa3c99","stable_key":"import-33bef151-bdc7-5892-aff6-0345ab149739","title":"Nattokinase: what the purified enzyme cleaves, what survives being eaten, and the gap between the two (2026-09-23)","document_type":"imported_text","citation_label":"Original AI-assisted curation built from a supplied entity-first document of 105 entities and 129 claims. Every reference in that document was resolved against live PubMed with its abstract read and its DOI cross-checked on 2026-09-23, and the EFSA novel-food opinion was retrieved and read in full. That check corrected two PMIDs that pointed at unrelated papers, two DOIs, and two papers recorded as carrying no erratum that do carry one; it also reversed three findings the supplied document had stated backwards. Two papers carry a published correction, recorded as such and not as a retraction. Three sources are not indexed in PubMed and are cited by what they have. Laboratory lineages are recorded, so the four papers from one group, the three from another and the two readings of a single applicant dossier cannot be counted as separate lines of support. Study-specific doses, units, populations and limitations retained; activity units are never converted between systems. Not publisher full text.","file_path":"","sha256":"34fc46e0e849d06bfa13cb099a79b50679dd6fd0de8a5a0575326afdde3259c1","revision_id":"efd063e6-e982-5f6e-a4b8-6f2ffe4185ce","review_status":"unverified_draft","notes":""}}],"relations":[],"conflicts":[],"corrections":[],"research":null}